Legal
Accessibility
This site has not been formally audited, so it does not claim conformance. What it can do is tell you exactly what was built deliberately, what is known to be imperfect, and how to report the rest — which is more useful than a badge.
Last updated: 7 September 2026
1 · The status, stated plainly
No formal accessibility audit has been carried out, so no conformance level is claimed — not WCAG 2.2 AA, not Section 508, not EN 301 549. The target is WCAG 2.2 AA and the work below was done against it, but intent is not conformance and this page will not pretend otherwise.
2 · What was built deliberately
- Real controls, not painted ones. Toggles are real checkboxes under styled tracks, so keyboard focus, space to toggle and the accessibility tree all work without being reimplemented.
- A skip link to the main content, on every page.
- Semantic structure. One
h1per page, headings in order, real tables withth scope, and definition lists where the content is term-and-value pairs. - Motion respects your settings. Every animation,
including the consent panel and the page reveals, is behind
prefers-reduced-motion. - Both colour themes are real. Light and dark follow your system unless you choose, and every colour comes from one token set rather than being hardcoded per component.
- The site works without JavaScript. The contact form
is a real
POST; the AI agent degrades to that form rather than to a broken screen. - Alerts are used sparingly. The agent announces a failure that needs your attention and deliberately does not announce a result you merely disagree with.
3 · What is known to fall short
Named rather than discovered, because you would find them anyway.
- No screen-reader testing has been done with NVDA, JAWS or VoiceOver. The markup is written to be correct; nobody has sat down and listened to it.
- Colour contrast has not been measured across every combination. The palette was designed for it, and the muted text on muted surfaces is the pairing most likely to fail.
- The AI agent is the least tested surface. It is the most interactive part of the site, streams content into the page as it arrives, and has had the least accessibility attention. If something here fails you, it is most likely to be that.
- The inline diagrams on the case studies are SVG with limited text alternatives. The surrounding prose carries the argument, but the diagrams are not fully described.
- No VPAT exists. If your procurement needs one, say so — it is a real piece of work rather than a document to generate.
4 · Telling me about a problem
Write to privacy@iambogdan.com or use the contact form. Tell me the page, what you were trying to do, and what you use — that is usually enough to reproduce it.
If something here blocks you from making contact at all, the postal address on the legal notice is not a formality; it works.
5 · What would change this page
An audit. Until one happens, section 1 stays as it is — and if section 3 ever looks empty, assume something was deleted rather than fixed.